mini-project grading

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Srinivasan Seshan (srini@cmu.edu)
Date: 02/04/03


Hi All,

Just thought I'd let you know no more about the grading of the mini-project.

In general, don't worry too much about the grading. We realize that students
are coming from different backgrounds. In addition, we also know that it can
be tough dealing with experimental software at times. Hope you will bear
with us and we appreciate your efforts in catching bugs, etc.

The primary goal of the mini-project was to familiarize you with the
infrastructure available for your project (so that you can make good project
proposals) and to provide context for the lectures. We will largely be
considering your effort just as much as your end results in the grading ;-)

        Srini
__________________________________________________________________________
Srinivasan Seshan Tel: 412-268-8734
Assistant Professor Email: srini@cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University Web: www.cs.cmu.edu/~srini

----- Original Message -----
From: "Suman Nath" <sknath@cs.cmu.edu>
To: <irisnet-course@intel-iris.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: DNS problems

>
> There is a confusion about whether the line "dns server=128.2.206.1"
> should be deleted from the oa.cfg file.
>
> The answer is "no, you should keep it there".
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Jennifer Morris wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > At 08:53 AM 2/4/2003 -0800, Suman Nath wrote:
> > >You should use the server 128.2.206.1 in your oa.cfg file. Why did you
> > >delete that line?
> > >
> > >Delete the existing DNS entires (by delete command) before adding them
again
> > >(by addfile, breakfile)
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought I was supposed to. Here's the email thread from the mailing
list
> > that told us to do that.
> >
> > -Jen
> >
> >
> >
> > To: irisnet-course@intel-iris.net
> > Subject: Re: dns
> >
> > I used the workaround proposed by Suman, and deleted the dns server line
> > from oa.cfg. However, my machine still resolves the relevant IPs to
> > 10.212.3.33. I used dig to check the dsan.net server, and it has the
> > correct IP.
> >
> > Apparently the DNS server I am using is caching the old value. Is there
a
> > way to fix this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, mukesh agrawal wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Short answer: The problem is the "dns server" line in the oa.cfg
file.
> > > Delete it (or comment it out), and your troubles will go away.
> > >
> > > Long answer:
> > >
> > > In order to update DNS, the OA has to send the new information to a
DNS
> > > server. The "DNS server" line tells the OA the IP address of the DNS
> > > server to contact. Unfortunately, the value that's in the oa.cfg file
> > > seems to be incorrect. It does not match the address of the
nameserver
> > > that is responsible for answering queries for dsan.net.
> > >
> > > When you delete the "dns server" line, the software that's
responsible for
> > > updating DNS figures out which DNS server to contact automatically.
> > >
> > > > According to the project description document, when we do the
'addfile'
> > > > command, DNS should be updated appropriately. Is this true? It does
not
> > > > appear to be happening. In my xml file I have owner-sensor set to
my own
> > > > IP, but DNS doesn't seem to be changed.
> > > >
> > > > At this point, CannedQueries is failing because it can't contact
the right
> > > > server (WH.CMU.Oakland.jnewsomePTROOT.dsan.net), which resolves to
> > > > 10.212.3.33. This appears to be a default, as
any_random_string.dsan.net
> > > > resolves to the same IP.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/04/03 EST